Zeolite Amendment effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth, physiology
and soil properties under sewage and clean water Irrigation
ABSTRACT
Wheat is an essential crop with great significance in human nutrition.
Experiment will be performed in agrimony field area, KFUEIT. Zeolite amendments
i.e., 0,5,10,15,20 kg/acre will be applied with fresh ground water as well as
sewerage water making total 10 treatments with 3 replication each with 10
experimental units. Parameters like days taken for germination (days),
germination percentage (%), length of shoot (cm), fresh weight of shoot (g),
dry weight of shoot (g), total number of tillers, total number of grains each
tiller, weight of grains (g), chlorophyll content (SPAD), length of root (cm),
diameter of root (mm), root’s fresh weight (g), root’s dry weight (g), and
number of roots will be evaluated and recorded data will be statistically
analyzed via statistix 8.1.
1 Description of the Research Work
Wheat is an essential crop with great significance in human
nutrition. It is also one of the oldest
grains, besides barley, that humans have cultivated for approximately decem
milenniuum. Emmer, the first subjugate type of wheat, was cultivated in the
Middle East. With the passage of time, the cultivation of common wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) (Erenstein et al., 2022). We, humans, Approximately consume two out of three of wheat grains
grown, with the remainder is used for other purposes like animal consumption
and commercial purposes. It is a vey important outcome of agriculture, offering
energy, carbohydrates, protein, fats, fiber, and essential minerals (Kheiralipour et al., 2024).
Wheat is a highly nourishing food, high in protein, minerals, B
vitamins, and dietary fiber. It is the primary cereal used in bread making due
to its gluten content, which helps dough retain gas and stick together (Kumar et al., 2011). Wheat also offers medicinal benefits: its starch and gluten
provide energy, while the inner chaff contains phosphates and mineral salts.
The outer chaff offers essential roughage for bowel health, and the germ is a
source of vitamins B and E. Additionally, wheat protein supports muscle growth
and repair (Kumar et al., 2011).
In 2021, global wheat production reached 788 million Mg across
approximately 546 million acres, with a mean return of 1.42 Mg per acre while
total wheat demand is 797 million Tons (Kheiralipour et al., 2024).Pakistan as an agriculture dependent country produces 28 MMT of
wheat in 2024 i.e., Punjab 21.2 MMT, Sindh 3.8 MMT, KPK 1.4 MMT and Baluchistan
1.6 MMT respectively (USDA, 2024). Approximately 8.8 to 9 million hectare of
land was utilized under wheat cultivation (USDA, 2024). Global wheat demand is
projected to rise by 26% till the mid of this century to meet the needs of a population
which is growing day by day, requiring a 2% annual increase in wheat
production. To ensure food security, improving wheat yield performance is
essential, especially with production challenges posed by resource depletion,
land loss, and climate change (Ouda and Zohry, 2024).
Excessive use of uncontrolled fertilizers and pesticides along with
unmanaged soil irrigation methods lead to the destruction of top soil layer
thus decrease in crop yield (Gholamhoseini et al., 2013). In Ethiopia, land degradation, driven by the destruction of
forests, excessive grazing by animals, excessive tillage, and unendurable
farming exercises, leads to significant economic losses. The annual land
degradation cost is approximately $4.3 billion, with maize and wheat farms
alone contributing to a loss of $162 million (Desta et al., 2021). Yield losses from poor soil conditions pose a significant threat
to wheat production and the economic stability of farmers in the U.S. and
Canada I.e., Winter wheat yield losses in the United States are estimated to be
in between 2.9% to 34.4%, with 25.6% (weighted average), while Canada
experienced a 2.9% loss, and the combined loss for both countries was 23.4% (Flessner et al., 2021).
Practice of adding amendments like manure as well as wheat husk to
soil to maintain its structure were carried out in past and still have good
impacts. Land application of sewage sludge recycles organic matter and
essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, reducing the need
for expensive fertilizers. It also improves key soil properties, enhancing soil
fertility and crop productivity (Verma et al., 2021). Zeolites
are highly effective for soil restoration, improving soil structure, enhancing
nutrient and water retention, regulating pH levels, and removing impurities.
With a high specific surface area, they significantly improve the soil’s
sorption capacity, transforming degraded soils into productive land and
benefiting both soil management and environmental health (Kukowska and Szewczuk-Karpisz, 2024).
Urbanization, water shortages, pollution, and the growing demand
for food due to the tremendous and uncontrolled increase in population necessitate
more efficient usage of irrigation and fertilizer. Holding water along with
nutrients in soils enhances yields of crop and decrease risk of watercourse
pollution. Zeolites, natural, environmentally friendly, and inexpensive
minerals, are increasingly used in agriculture as soil conditioners (Nakhli et al., 2017). They improve soil characteristics, involving percolation rate,
water holding capacity (WHC), and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Zeolites
effectively hold moisture and nutrients like ammonium, phosphate, nitrate,
potassium, and sulfate in their porous structure, and are used as slow-release
fertilizers (SRFs). Their application boosts water and nutrient use efficiency
(WUE and NUE), reducing the risk of water pollution (Nakhli et al., 2017).
2 Need and Objectives of research
Increasing population demands higher agricultural efficiency to
meet food production needs. As urbanization reduces arable land, efficient
cultivation becomes essential for sustaining urban growth. However, achieving
high agricultural productivity faces challenges, particularly in irrigation and
fertilization practices (Nakhli et al., 2017). Not all soil types are suitable for agriculture; clayey soils
hinder water infiltration, while sandy soils cause rapid water drainage.
Improving soil properties like infiltration and hydraulic conductivity,
especially in light-textured soils, zeolite amendment can enhance water and
nutrient retention, boosting irrigation efficiency due to its water retaining,
more surface area and ecofriendly nature. Soil structure play important role in
high crop yield, for better crop yield soil must contain amendments that can
retain dissolved fertilizers in it and make it available for plant use. Despite
all of these researches there were still gap to conduct an experiment on effect
of zeolite amendment effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum
L.), its physiology and properties of soil under sewage and clean water irrigation.
This study reveals the effectiveness of ecofriendly zeolite amendment over
toxic sludge water i.e., having toxic heavy metals in it. Research objectives are
given below.
Objectives:
o
To access the
optimum quantity of zeolite amendment for maximum wheat yield.
o
To compare
effectiveness of zeolite amendments over sludge water.
3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Chen et al. (2017) carried out a 2-year study to assess the effects of zeolite treatment
(Z) on lowland rice crop outcome, grade, and N utilization. Sticky paddy (cv.
Gangyu 6) was grown on light loamy soil under varying nitrogen applications (0,
52.5, 105.0, and 157.5 kg N ha−1) and Zeolite application dosage (0,
5, 10, 15 t Z ha−1). That study found that Zeolite application
increased the available nitrogen by 14.2% to 35.8% in the soil after harvesting
is completed and exchangeable potassium by 20.1% to 44.6%. Additionally,
efficiency of N fertilizer improved in between 39.0% to 64.4%, and efficiency of
recovery of nitrogen increased in between 20.7% to 85.2%. The protein level of Rice
increased with application of zeolite, although the refining process, physical
traits, and palatability remain unaffected. The enhanced yield was attributed
to better availability of vital compounds, which minimize unproductive tillers
and increased the productive tiller count per meter squared. These benefits
were sustained for minimum one year after the initial Z application.
Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) experimented to assess the influence of cattle manure mixed with Z
and synthetic fertilizers on helianthus annuus production, quality, and water-driven
nutrient losses under two watering routines in a semi-arid region of Iran. The
study used a blocked random design with two watering treatments (complete
irrigation, I1, and limited irrigation, I2) and five
fertilization strategies. Results showed that decreased irrigation (I2)
causes a significant decrease in yield (dry matter) up to 9% in 2008 and 10% in
2009. Manure along with zeolite application improved crop yield, with the
highest protein content of seed recorded in the F5 treatment (urea + CM with
21% zeolite). Peak irrigation water productivity (0.81 kg m−3) was recorded
with the I2F5 applied combination in 2009 and the least
was with I1F1 (0.48 kg m−3). Nitrate leaching
was greatest with the I1F1 combination (36 kg ha−1)
and lowest with I2F5 (11 kg ha−1).
Al-Busaidi et al. (2008) performed a study to assess results of zeolite application on
properties of soil along with barley growth under saline irrigation. It was
grown on sandy dune soil applied with 1% and 5% Ca- zeolite and irrigated with
seawater diluted to 3 and 16 dS m−1 EC. Application of water with 16
dS m−1 saline water reduced 25% height of plant, 44% leaf area and
dry weight by 60%. But, zeolite-treated soils showed a significant increase in
plant biomass. Zeolite enhanced the water and salt holding capacity of soil.
Post-harvest soil study reflects reduced amount of Ca2+, Mg2+,
Na+ and K+ in zeolite-treated soils. The 5% zeolite
treatment increased Ca2+ in stressed plants and boosted iron (Fe2+)
by 19% and manganese (Mn2+) by 10%.
Głąb et al. (2021) conducted experiments to assess the outcomes of zeolite and
biochar on land remediation alongside grass productivity in Cd, Pb, and
Zn-contaminated soil. Treatments included zeolite, biochar (350 °C and 550 °C),
biochar-zeolite blender and a baseline. Results showed higher biomass in
zeolite (0.229 kg DM m−2) and biochar-zeolite treatments (0.239 kg
DM m−2) compared to the control (0.029 kg DM m−2).
Zeolite significantly increased the biomass
of root (2.30 mg cm−3). It also increased the length of root (76.61
cm cm−3) compared to treatments zeolite was not used (0.29 mg cm−3
and 6.90 cm cm−3). The Biochar
had little effect on root morphology, with only slight reductions in root
diameter for cocksfoot and tall fescue.
Sun et al. (2019) performed an experiment for appraising influence of Clinoptilolite
zeolite (Z) at volatilization of ammonia (NH3), nitrogen leaching, yield
of rice, water productivity (WP), and economical benefits by applying 2
watering treatments: firstly Continuously
Flooded (CF); secondly Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD). This study was
conducted over two years with three Z application amounts (0, 5, 10 t Z ha−1)
in a split-plot design. Evaluation reflects AWD lightly decreases volatilization
of ammonia in absence of zeolite. And raised residual mineral N (RMN) and N
leaching compared to CF. Adding 5 and 10 t Z ha−1 boosted RMN up to
12% and 21% in the soil depth of 0–30 cm, respectively, but decreased it by 18%
and 32% in the depth of 30–60 cm. Zeolite amendment decreased ammonia
volatilization and Nitrogen leaching while promoting nitrogen uptake, yield of rice
grain, and WP, specifically under the AWD. During the time of study, rice yield
was increased by using 10 t Z ha−1 and WP by $126–195 ha−1
in comparison of CF without zeolite, showing that Z could enhance rice
production systems.
Shahbaz et al. (2019) performed an experiment to evaluate the impact of biochar (BR) and
zeolite (ZL) amendments along with combination of proline (PN) foliar application
at wheat tolerance to nickel (Ni) toxicity and Ni accumulation in Ni-rich soil affected
by electroplating wastewater. Experimental factors included controlled, BR, ZL,
combination (BR50% + ZL50%), with and without PN spray. Results showed that the
last one (blended treatment) considerably fix nickel in soil and also lessened nickel
deposition in wheat shoots, roots, and grains, and improved photosynthetic
parameters, antioxidant activities, grain biochemistry, and yield compared to
the control. The PN spray had promoting effect, improving plant’s capacity to remove
reactive oxygen species (ROS), blocking lipid peroxidation, and increasing
resilience to Ni stress.
Baddour and El-Kafrawy (2020) performed an experiment assessing the impact of zeolite soil
addition at maize growth and yield under different irrigation intervals. The
study included two main treatments: Z0 (absence of zeolite, control)
and Z1 (presence of zeolite at 10 Mg ha−1), combined with
three watering phases: I1 (every 12 days, traditional waternig), I2
(every 14 days), and I3 (every 16 days, deficit watering). The
research followed a split-plot design and had three replications. Key
measurements included biochemical parameters (total chlorophyll, phenols, proline)
and plant height (vegetative growth), in addition to quantitative (e.g., number
of grains per ear, yield) along with qualitative yield traits (protein, carbohydrates,
and oil). Results showed that zeolite addition (Z1) with a 14-day
irrigation interval (I2) improved both quantitative and qualitative
yield compared to the control with traditional irrigation. The analysis of the
given soil after harvesting showed that zeolite improved properties of soil such
as bulk density, total porosity, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and field
capacity (FC).
Experiment will be performed in Agronomy field area, under RCBD conditions. Wheat cultivar
(xxxxx) seed will be obtained from (xxxxxxxxxxx). Five treatment level of
zeolite including control (0,5,10,15,20 kg/acr) will be applied to crop via
fresh ground water as well as sewerage water separately and results will be
cross compared. There will be 3 replication and 10 observation units in each replication
in each treatment. Total treatments area shown below.
Control = T0 =
0 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 1 = T1 = 5 kg/acre + Fresh ground
water
Treatment 2 = T2
= 10 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 3 = T3
= 15 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 4 = T4 = 20 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 5 = T5 = 0 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 6 = T6 = 5 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 7 = T7
= 10 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 8 = T8
= 15 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 9 = T9 = 20 kg/acre + sewerage water
Parameters:
Following parameters will be examined and data will be collected:
Days taken for germication (days)
Germination percentage (%)
Length of shoot (cm)
Shoot fresh weight (g)
Shoot dry weight (g)
Number of tillers
Number of grains per tiller
Weight of grains (g)
Chlorophyll content (SPAD)
Length of root (cm)
Diameter of root (mm)
Root’s fresh weight (g)
Root’s dry weight (g)
Number of roots
Statistical analysis
Data of wheat parameters will be collected and statistically
analyzed via statistics 8.1 (Steel et al., 1997)
1 Description of the
Research Work
Wheat is an essential crop with great significance in human
nutrition. It is also one of the oldest
grains, besides barley, that humans have cultivated for approximately decem
milenniuum. Emmer, the first subjugate type of wheat, was cultivated in the
Middle East. With the passage of time, the cultivation of common wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) (Erenstein et al., 2022). We, humans, Approximately consume two out of three of wheat grains
grown, with the remainder is used for other purposes like animal consumption
and commercial purposes. It is a vey important outcome of agriculture, offering
energy, carbohydrates, protein, fats, fiber, and essential minerals (Kheiralipour et al., 2024).
Wheat is a highly nourishing food, high in protein, minerals, B
vitamins, and dietary fiber. It is the primary cereal used in bread making due
to its gluten content, which helps dough retain gas and stick together (Kumar et al., 2011). Wheat also offers medicinal benefits: its starch and gluten
provide energy, while the inner chaff contains phosphates and mineral salts.
The outer chaff offers essential roughage for bowel health, and the germ is a
source of vitamins B and E. Additionally, wheat protein supports muscle growth
and repair (Kumar et al., 2011).
In 2021, global wheat production reached 788 million Mg across
approximately 546 million acres, with a mean return of 1.42 Mg per acre while
total wheat demand is 797 million Tons (Kheiralipour et al., 2024).Pakistan as an agriculture dependent country produces 28 MMT of
wheat in 2024 i.e., Punjab 21.2 MMT, Sindh 3.8 MMT, KPK 1.4 MMT and Baluchistan
1.6 MMT respectively (USDA, 2024). Approximately 8.8 to 9 million hectare of
land was utilized under wheat cultivation (USDA, 2024). Global wheat demand is
projected to rise by 26% till the mid of this century to meet the needs of a population
which is growing day by day, requiring a 2% annual increase in wheat
production. To ensure food security, improving wheat yield performance is
essential, especially with production challenges posed by resource depletion,
land loss, and climate change (Ouda and Zohry, 2024).
Excessive use of uncontrolled fertilizers and pesticides along with
unmanaged soil irrigation methods lead to the destruction of top soil layer
thus decrease in crop yield (Gholamhoseini et al., 2013). In Ethiopia, land degradation, driven by the destruction of
forests, excessive grazing by animals, excessive tillage, and unendurable
farming exercises, leads to significant economic losses. The annual land
degradation cost is approximately $4.3 billion, with maize and wheat farms
alone contributing to a loss of $162 million (Desta et al., 2021). Yield losses from poor soil conditions pose a significant threat
to wheat production and the economic stability of farmers in the U.S. and
Canada I.e., Winter wheat yield losses in the United States are estimated to be
in between 2.9% to 34.4%, with 25.6% (weighted average), while Canada
experienced a 2.9% loss, and the combined loss for both countries was 23.4% (Flessner et al., 2021).
Practice of adding amendments like manure as well as wheat husk to
soil to maintain its structure were carried out in past and still have good
impacts. Land application of sewage sludge recycles organic matter and
essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, reducing the need
for expensive fertilizers. It also improves key soil properties, enhancing soil
fertility and crop productivity (Verma et al., 2021). Zeolites
are highly effective for soil restoration, improving soil structure, enhancing
nutrient and water retention, regulating pH levels, and removing impurities.
With a high specific surface area, they significantly improve the soil’s
sorption capacity, transforming degraded soils into productive land and
benefiting both soil management and environmental health (Kukowska and Szewczuk-Karpisz, 2024).
Urbanization, water shortages, pollution, and the growing demand
for food due to the tremendous and uncontrolled increase in population necessitate
more efficient usage of irrigation and fertilizer. Holding water along with
nutrients in soils enhances yields of crop and decrease risk of watercourse
pollution. Zeolites, natural, environmentally friendly, and inexpensive
minerals, are increasingly used in agriculture as soil conditioners (Nakhli et al., 2017). They improve soil characteristics, involving percolation rate,
water holding capacity (WHC), and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Zeolites
effectively hold moisture and nutrients like ammonium, phosphate, nitrate,
potassium, and sulfate in their porous structure, and are used as slow-release
fertilizers (SRFs). Their application boosts water and nutrient use efficiency
(WUE and NUE), reducing the risk of water pollution (Nakhli et al., 2017).
2 Need and Objectives of research
Increasing population demands higher agricultural efficiency to
meet food production needs. As urbanization reduces arable land, efficient
cultivation becomes essential for sustaining urban growth. However, achieving
high agricultural productivity faces challenges, particularly in irrigation and
fertilization practices (Nakhli et al., 2017). Not all soil types are suitable for agriculture; clayey soils
hinder water infiltration, while sandy soils cause rapid water drainage.
Improving soil properties like infiltration and hydraulic conductivity,
especially in light-textured soils, zeolite amendment can enhance water and
nutrient retention, boosting irrigation efficiency due to its water retaining,
more surface area and ecofriendly nature. Soil structure play important role in
high crop yield, for better crop yield soil must contain amendments that can
retain dissolved fertilizers in it and make it available for plant use. Despite
all of these researches there were still gap to conduct an experiment on effect
of zeolite amendment effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum
L.), its physiology and properties of soil under sewage and clean water irrigation.
This study reveals the effectiveness of ecofriendly zeolite amendment over
toxic sludge water i.e., having toxic heavy metals in it. Research objectives are
given below.
Objectives:
o
To access the
optimum quantity of zeolite amendment for maximum wheat yield.
o
To compare
effectiveness of zeolite amendments over sludge water.
3 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Chen et al. (2017) carried out a 2-year study to assess the effects of zeolite treatment
(Z) on lowland rice crop outcome, grade, and N utilization. Sticky paddy (cv.
Gangyu 6) was grown on light loamy soil under varying nitrogen applications (0,
52.5, 105.0, and 157.5 kg N ha−1) and Zeolite application dosage (0,
5, 10, 15 t Z ha−1). That study found that Zeolite application
increased the available nitrogen by 14.2% to 35.8% in the soil after harvesting
is completed and exchangeable potassium by 20.1% to 44.6%. Additionally,
efficiency of N fertilizer improved in between 39.0% to 64.4%, and efficiency of
recovery of nitrogen increased in between 20.7% to 85.2%. The protein level of Rice
increased with application of zeolite, although the refining process, physical
traits, and palatability remain unaffected. The enhanced yield was attributed
to better availability of vital compounds, which minimize unproductive tillers
and increased the productive tiller count per meter squared. These benefits
were sustained for minimum one year after the initial Z application.
Gholamhoseini et al. (2013) experimented to assess the influence of cattle manure mixed with Z
and synthetic fertilizers on helianthus annuus production, quality, and water-driven
nutrient losses under two watering routines in a semi-arid region of Iran. The
study used a blocked random design with two watering treatments (complete
irrigation, I1, and limited irrigation, I2) and five
fertilization strategies. Results showed that decreased irrigation (I2)
causes a significant decrease in yield (dry matter) up to 9% in 2008 and 10% in
2009. Manure along with zeolite application improved crop yield, with the
highest protein content of seed recorded in the F5 treatment (urea + CM with
21% zeolite). Peak irrigation water productivity (0.81 kg m−3) was recorded
with the I2F5 applied combination in 2009 and the least
was with I1F1 (0.48 kg m−3). Nitrate leaching
was greatest with the I1F1 combination (36 kg ha−1)
and lowest with I2F5 (11 kg ha−1).
Al-Busaidi et al. (2008) performed a study to assess results of zeolite application on
properties of soil along with barley growth under saline irrigation. It was
grown on sandy dune soil applied with 1% and 5% Ca- zeolite and irrigated with
seawater diluted to 3 and 16 dS m−1 EC. Application of water with 16
dS m−1 saline water reduced 25% height of plant, 44% leaf area and
dry weight by 60%. But, zeolite-treated soils showed a significant increase in
plant biomass. Zeolite enhanced the water and salt holding capacity of soil.
Post-harvest soil study reflects reduced amount of Ca2+, Mg2+,
Na+ and K+ in zeolite-treated soils. The 5% zeolite
treatment increased Ca2+ in stressed plants and boosted iron (Fe2+)
by 19% and manganese (Mn2+) by 10%.
Głąb et al. (2021) conducted experiments to assess the outcomes of zeolite and
biochar on land remediation alongside grass productivity in Cd, Pb, and
Zn-contaminated soil. Treatments included zeolite, biochar (350 °C and 550 °C),
biochar-zeolite blender and a baseline. Results showed higher biomass in
zeolite (0.229 kg DM m−2) and biochar-zeolite treatments (0.239 kg
DM m−2) compared to the control (0.029 kg DM m−2).
Zeolite significantly increased the biomass of root (2.30 mg cm−3).
It also increased the length of root (76.61 cm cm−3) compared to
treatments zeolite was not used (0.29 mg cm−3 and 6.90 cm cm−3).
The Biochar had little effect on root
morphology, with only slight reductions in root diameter for cocksfoot and tall
fescue.
Sun et al. (2019) performed an experiment for appraising influence of Clinoptilolite
zeolite (Z) at volatilization of ammonia (NH3), nitrogen leaching, yield
of rice, water productivity (WP), and economical benefits by applying 2
watering treatments: firstly Continuously Flooded (CF); secondly Alternate Wetting
and Drying (AWD). This study was conducted over two years with three Z application
amounts (0, 5, 10 t Z ha−1) in a split-plot design. Evaluation reflects
AWD lightly decreases volatilization of ammonia in absence of zeolite. And raised
residual mineral N (RMN) and N leaching compared to CF. Adding 5 and 10 t Z ha−1
boosted RMN up to 12% and 21% in the soil depth of 0–30 cm, respectively, but decreased
it by 18% and 32% in the depth of 30–60 cm. Zeolite amendment decreased ammonia
volatilization and Nitrogen leaching while promoting nitrogen uptake, yield of rice
grain, and WP, specifically under the AWD. During the time of study, rice yield
was increased by using 10 t Z ha−1 and WP by $126–195 ha−1
in comparison of CF without zeolite, showing that Z could enhance rice
production systems.
Shahbaz et al. (2019) performed an experiment to evaluate the impact of biochar (BR) and
zeolite (ZL) amendments along with combination of proline (PN) foliar application
at wheat tolerance to nickel (Ni) toxicity and Ni accumulation in Ni-rich soil affected
by electroplating wastewater. Experimental factors included controlled, BR, ZL,
combination (BR50% + ZL50%), with and without PN spray. Results showed that the
last one (blended treatment) considerably fix nickel in soil and also lessened nickel
deposition in wheat shoots, roots, and grains, and improved photosynthetic
parameters, antioxidant activities, grain biochemistry, and yield compared to
the control. The PN spray had promoting effect, improving plant’s capacity to remove
reactive oxygen species (ROS), blocking lipid peroxidation, and increasing
resilience to Ni stress.
Baddour and El-Kafrawy (2020) performed an experiment assessing the impact of zeolite soil
addition at maize growth and yield under different irrigation intervals. The
study included two main treatments: Z0 (absence of zeolite, control)
and Z1 (presence of zeolite at 10 Mg ha−1), combined with
three watering phases: I1 (every 12 days, traditional waternig), I2
(every 14 days), and I3 (every 16 days, deficit watering). The
research followed a split-plot design and had three replications. Key
measurements included biochemical parameters (total chlorophyll, phenols, proline)
and plant height (vegetative growth), in addition to quantitative (e.g., number
of grains per ear, yield) along with qualitative yield traits (protein, carbohydrates,
and oil). Results showed that zeolite addition (Z1) with a 14-day
irrigation interval (I2) improved both quantitative and qualitative
yield compared to the control with traditional irrigation. The analysis of the
given soil after harvesting showed that zeolite improved properties of soil such
as bulk density, total porosity, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and field
capacity (FC).
4 Material and Methods
Experiment will be performed in Agronomy field area, Khawaja Fareed
University of Engineering and Technology under RCBD conditions. Wheat cultivar
(Dilkash-20) seed will be obtained from Punjab Seed Corporation, Punjab,
Pakistan. Five treatment level of zeolite including control (0,5,10,15,20
kg/acr) will be applied to crop via fresh ground water as well as sewerage
water separately and results will be cross compared. There will be 3 replication
and 10 observation units in each replication in each treatment. Total
treatments area shown below.
Control = T0 =
0 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 1 = T1 = 5 kg/acre + Fresh ground
water
Treatment 2 = T2
= 10 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 3 = T3
= 15 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 4 = T4 = 20 kg/acre + Fresh ground water
Treatment 5 = T5 = 0 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 6 = T6 = 5 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 7 = T7
= 10 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 8 = T8
= 15 kg/acre + sewerage water
Treatment 9 = T9 = 20 kg/acre + sewerage water
Parameters:
Following parameters will be examined and data will be collected:
Days taken for germication (days)
Germination percentage (%)
Length of shoot (cm)
Shoot fresh weight (g)
Shoot dry weight (g)
Number of tillers
Number of grains per tiller
Weight of grains (g)
Chlorophyll content (SPAD)
Length of root (cm)
Diameter of root (mm)
Root’s fresh weight (g)
Root’s dry weight (g)
Number of roots
Statistical analysis
Data of wheat parameters will be collected and statistically
analyzed via statistics 8.1 (Steel et al., 1997)
Summary of the research:
Wheat is an
essential crop with great significance in human nutrition. Today Pakistan is
struggling to produce enough wheat to fulfill its national consumption
requirement. Also, we are facing a significant risk of drought-like situations
due to global warming in recent times. Therefore, we need to increase per acre
yield, keeping in mind to effectively use every drop of available water. Experiment will be performed in agrimony
field area of Zeolite amendments i.e., 0,5,10, t/ha will be applied
with fresh ground water as well as sewerage water making total 6 treatments
with 3 replication each with 10 experimental units. Our study will evaluate the
effect of treatment combinations on plant height, biomass production,
photosynthesis, chlorophyll content, antioxidant enzymes, proline
concentration, water loss through stomata, water use efficiency and grain
yield. Collected data will be analyzed with the use of a computer software
Statistix 8.1. The study will also elaborate the effects of zeolite amendment on
wheat plants including physiological responses and soil conditions under sewage
or clean water irrigation. The study will solidify the usefulness of zeolite in
nutritional efficiency improvement while mitigating the assimilation of heavy
metals and reducing stress which are related to watering in cultivated crop.
The results of study would enlighten the path for sustainable agricultural principles’
development by upgrading soil management techniques and ensure the wheat production
in many water quality settings.
|
Introduction: Wheat
is an essential crop with great significance in human nutrition. It is also
one of the oldest grains, besides barley, that humans have cultivated for
approximately decem milenniuum. Emmer, the first subjugate type of wheat, was
cultivated in the Middle East. With the passage of time, the cultivation of
common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) increases (Erenstein et
al., 2022). We,
humans, approximately consume two out of three of wheat grains grown, with
the remainder is used for other purposes like animal consumption and
commercial purposes. It is a very important outcome of agriculture, offering
energy, carbohydrates, protein, fats, fiber, and essential minerals (Kheiralipour et
al., 2024). Wheat
is a highly nourishing food, high in protein, minerals, B vitamins, and
dietary fiber. It is the primary cereal used in bread making due to its
gluten content, which helps dough retain gas and stick together (Kumar et al.,
2011). Wheat
also offers medicinal benefits: its starch and gluten provide energy, while
the inner chaff contains phosphates and mineral salts. The outer chaff offers
essential roughage for bowel health, and the germ is a source of vitamins B
and E. Additionally, wheat protein supports muscle growth and repair (Kumar et al.,
2011). In
2021, global wheat production reached 788 million Mg across approximately 546
million acres, with a mean return of 1.42 Mg per acre while total wheat
demand is 797 million Tons (Kheiralipour
et al., 2024). Pakistan
as an agriculture dependent country produces 28 MMT of wheat in 2024 i.e.,
Punjab 21.2 MMT, Sindh 3.8 MMT, KPK 1.4 MMT and Baluchistan 1.6 MMT
respectively (USDA, 2024). Approximately 8.8 to 9 million hectare of land was
utilized under wheat cultivation (USDA, 2024). Global wheat demand is
projected to rise by 26% till the mid of this century to meet the needs of a
population which is growing day by day, requiring a 2% annual increase in
wheat production. To ensure food security, improving wheat yield performance
is essential, especially with production challenges posed by resource
depletion, land loss, and climate change (Ouda and Zohry, 2024). Excessive
use of uncontrolled fertilizers and pesticides along with unmanaged soil
irrigation methods lead to the destruction of top soil layer thus decreasing
crop yield (Gholamhoseini
et al., 2013). In
Ethiopia, land degradation, driven by the destruction of forests, excessive
grazing by animals, excessive tillage, and unendurable farming exercises,
leads to significant economic losses. The
annual land degradation cost is approximately $4.3 billion, with maize and
wheat farms alone contributing to a loss of $162 million (Desta et al.,
2021). Yield
losses from poor soil conditions pose a significant threat to wheat
production and the economic stability of farmers in the U.S. and Canada I.e.,
Winter wheat yield losses in the United States are estimated to be in between
2.9% to 34.4%, with 25.6% (weighted average), while Canada experienced a 2.9%
loss, and the combined loss for both countries was 23.4% (Flessner et
al., 2021). The
practice of adding amendments like manure as well as wheat husk to the soil
to maintain its structure was carried out in the past and still has good
impacts. Land application of sewage sludge recycles organic matter and
essential nutrients like nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, reducing the
need for expensive fertilizers. It also improves key soil properties,
enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity (Verma et al.,
2021).
Zeolites
are highly effective for soil restoration, improving soil structure,
enhancing nutrient and water retention, regulating pH levels, and removing
impurities. With a high specific surface area, they significantly improve the
soil’s sorption capacity, transforming degraded soils into productive land
and benefiting both soil management and environmental health (Kukowska and Szewczuk-Karpisz, 2024). Urbanization,
water shortages, pollution, and the growing demand for food due to the
tremendous and uncontrolled increase in population necessitate more efficient
usage of irrigation and fertilizer. Holding water along with nutrients in
soils enhances the yields of crops and decreases the risk of watercourse
pollution. Zeolites, natural, environmentally friendly, and inexpensive
minerals, are increasingly used in agriculture as soil conditioners (Nakhli et al.,
2017). They
improve soil characteristics, involving percolation rate, water holding
capacity (WHC), and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Zeolite effectively hold
moisture and nutrients like ammonium, phosphate, nitrate, potassium, and
sulfate in their porous structure, and are used as slow-release fertilizers
(SRFs). Their application boosts water and nutrient use efficiency (WUE and
NUE), reducing the risk of water pollution (Nakhli et al.,
2017). This study will help to examine how wheat crop
production is affected by zeolite together with wheat’s biological traits and
quality of soil under the implementation of different irrigation methods
i.e., sewage and freshwater irrigation. Zeolite is a naturally occurring
aluminosilicate mineral that shows a remarkable decrease in heavy metal
impacts on crops and significantly increases their water uptake (Hassan et
al.,2024). The application
of zeolite can help in greatly improving the growth and production of
chlorophyll in wheat crops which, ultimately, leads to improved
photosynthesis rate (Mahmoud et al, 2023). Moreover, it also plays a positive role in the
improvement of the structure of soil by restricting unwanted adsorption of
heavy metals rather boosting access to nutrients while sewage water is being
used for irrigation (Mondal et al., 2021). This experimental study will help the future
researchers in creating more flawless framework of agricultural practices
ensuring soils protection and production of healthy food in the given severe
water shortage and environmental changes due to unfavorable climate change. |
|
Statement
of the Problem: Increasing population demands
higher agricultural efficiency to meet food production needs. As urbanization
reduces arable land, efficient cultivation becomes essential for sustaining
urban growth. However, achieving high agricultural productivity faces
challenges, particularly in irrigation and fertilization practices. Not all
soil types are suitable for agriculture; clayey soils hinder water
infiltration, while sandy soils cause rapid water drainage. Improving soil
properties like infiltration and hydraulic conductivity, especially in
light-textured soils, zeolite amendment can enhance water and nutrient
retention, boosting irrigation efficiency due to its water retaining, more
surface area and ecofriendly nature. Soil structure play important role in
high crop yield, for better crop yield soil must contain amendments that can
retain dissolved fertilizers in it and make it available for plant use. Despite
all of these researches there were still gap to conduct an experiment on
effect of zeolite
amendment effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), its physiology
and properties of soil under sewage and clean water irrigation. This study
reveals the effectiveness of ecofriendly zeolite amendment over toxic sludge
water i.e., having toxic heavy metals in it. |
|
Research
Methodology: Field Layout This study will be conducted using a randomized
complete block design (RCBD) with six treatments and three replications to
evaluate zeolite amendment effect on wheat (Triticum
Aestivum L.) growth, physiology, and soil properties under sewage and
clean water irrigation. Wheat cultivar (Dilkash-20) seed will be obtained
from Punjab Seed Corporation, Punjab, Pakistan. The experiment will be
performed in the Agronomy field area, RCBD conditions. Treatments: Treatments will be applied at the appropriate stage of
wheat crop growth, usually during the vegetative and early reproductive
stages when nutrient and water uptake is high. T1= No Zeolite (ZEO) + normal canal water (NW) T2= 5 t/ha ZEO + NW T3= 10 t/ha ZEO +NW T4= No Zeolite (ZEO) + sewage water (SW) T5= 5 t/ha ZEO + SW T6= 10 t/ha ZEO + SW Applications should be given during the land
preparation and irrigation should be applied at critical life stages of
wheat. Data Collection Growth and Yield Parameters At crop’s maturity, A meter
rod and a weight balance will be used to note the following mentioned growth
and yield characteristics: 1.
Plant height (cm) 2.
Number of tillers per meter square 3.
Spike length (cm) 4.
Number of spikelets per spike 5.
Number of grains per spike 6.
1000-grain weight (g) 7.
Biological yield (kg/acre) 8.
Grain yield (kg/acre) Crop Growth and Physiological Traits Crop Growth Rate and Relative
Growth Rate will be assessed by taking biomasses. Leaf Area Index will be
determined by using a portable ‘leaf area meter’. At
the blooming stage, Relative Water Content (RWC) will be calculated for sampling
using the formula of (Barr & Weatherley, 1962). RWC
(%) = [(FW − DW)/ (TW − DW)] × 100 Where: FW = Fresh weight of leaves DW = Dry weight of leaves TW = Total weight of leaves The rate of photosynthesis
and stomatal conductance will be calculated at the anthesis phase by the
Infrared Gas Analyzer (Cl-340 Handheld Photosynthesis System, Camas, WA,
USA). the chlorophyll meter (CL-1, Hansatech Instruments Ltd., UK) shall be
used to determine the chlorophyll content. The following procedure will be
pursued to evaluate nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) uptake by
the plant at the anthesis phase. The oven will be used to oven-dried the
samples at 650 oC followed by grinding into a fine powder. This
fine powder will be sieved to less than 2mm. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and
sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) will be used for digestion in this case study (Wolf, 1982)
and by using Kjeldahl’s method the use of nitrogen (N) in this case will be determined
(Bremner, 1965). Spectrophotometric analysis
after digestion with concentrated acid will be done to evaluate phosphorus
(P) concentration. A flame photometer will be used to examine potassium (K)
concentration. At the phase of anthesis leakage of electric charge from
leaves will be examined by using the method evaluated by (Sullivan &
Ross, 1979) along with (Zaheer et al., 2022). Distilled H2O will be used to
wash the leaves and incubated at 23℃ in test tubes for 24 hours and a
vigorously shaking conductivity meter will be used to determine the EC. At
the phase of anthesis, for analyzing oxidative stress response of the plant, the
standard procedures Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (Nakano & Asada, 1981),
will be used alongside the following enzymatic activities, Catalase (CAT)
(Vanacker et al., 2000), Peroxidase (POD) (Ghanati et al., 2002), Superoxide
dismutase (SOD) (Beyer & Fridovich, 1987). Statistical Analysis: The significance of
treatment of the collected data will be analyzed with Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) using Statistix 8.1 software. Significant differences in between
treatments will be identified using LSD (Least Significant Difference) test
at p ≤ 0.05. Expected Outcomes: This study is anticipated to
lead to elevated growth, yield, and physiological traits of wheat (Triticum
aestivum L.) crop under given irrigation of both types and favorable
development in the properties of soil (e.g., cation exchange capacity, improved
moisture retention, and upgraded nutrient uptake). It is expected that a significant
decrease in heavy metal uptake and heavy metal leachability will be observed
after using the zeolite as a soil amendment, which will secure and enhance
safe food production all together with improved photosynthetic efficiency
with chlorophyll content and resilience towards drought. Moreover, it is
expected that an increased activity from beneficial microbes will be seen
which will ultimately ensure a lifelong fertile and stable soil. Hence, this research
work will add a significant contribution towards the expansion of a
sustainable strategy of using soil amendment minimizing the threat to sewage
irrigation practice and will encourage efficient resource usage and
ecologically responsible agricultural practices in order to support Climate
adaptive farming. |
|
Bibliography: Barrs, H., & Weatherley, P. (1962). A Re-Examination of
the Relative Turgidity Technique for Estimating Water Deficits in
Leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 15:413-428. Desta, G., L. Tamene,
W. Abera, T. Amede and A. Whitbread. 2021. Effects of land management
practices and land cover types on soil loss and crop productivity in
ethiopia: A review. International Soil and Water Conservation Research.
9:544-554. Erenstein, O., M.
Jaleta, K.A. Mottaleb, K. Sonder, J. Donovan and H.-J. Braun. 2022. Global
trends in wheat production, consumption and trade. In Wheat improvement: Food security in a changing climate: Springer International
Publishing Cham, 47-66. Evenden,
G. I. (1982). WOLF; automatic typing program. Open-File Report.
82-379. Flessner, M.L., I.C.
Burke, J.A. Dille, W.J. Everman, M.J. VanGessel, B. Tidemann, M.R.
Manuchehri, N. Soltani and P.H. Sikkema. 2021. Potential wheat yield loss due
to weeds in the united states and canada. Weed Technology. 35:916-923. Gholamhoseini, M., A.
Ghalavand, A. Khodaei-Joghan, A. Dolatabadian, H. Zakikhani and E. Farmanbar.
2013. Zeolite-amended cattle manure effects on sunflower yield, seed quality,
water use efficiency and nutrient leaching. Soil and Tillage Research.
126:193-202. Hassan, M. ul ., Shah, S. T., Basit, A., Hikal, W. M.,
Khan, M. A., Khan, W., … Said-Al Ahl, H. A. H. (2024). Improving Wheat Yield
with Zeolite and Tillage Practices under Rain-Fed Conditions. 13:8 Kheiralipour, K., M.
Brandão, M. Holka and A. Choryński. 2024. A review of environmental impacts
of wheat production in different agrotechnical systems. Resources. 13:93. Kukowska, S. and K.
Szewczuk-Karpisz. 2024. Biochar and zeolite uses in improving immobilization
of nutrients and pollutants in soils. Separation & Purification Reviews.
1-24. Kumar, P., R. Yadava,
B. Gollen, S. Kumar, R.K. Verma and S. Yadav. 2011. Nutritional contents
and medicinal properties of
wheat: A review. Life Sciences and Medicine Research. 22:1-10. Mahmoud, A. W. M., Rashad, H. M., Esmail, S. E. A.,
Alsamadany, H., & Abdeldaym, E. A. (2023). Application of Silicon, Zinc,
and Zeolite Nanoparticles—A Tool to Enhance Drought Stress Tolerance in
Coriander Plants for Better Growth Performance and Productivity. Plants. 12(15) Mondal, M., Biswas, B., Garai, S., Sarkar, S., Banerjee,
H., Brahmachari, K., … Hossain, A. (2021). Zeolites Enhance Soil Health, Crop
Productivity and Environmental Safety. Agronomy. 11(3) Nakhli, S.A.A., M.
Delkash, B.E. Bakhshayesh and H. Kazemian. 2017. Application of zeolites for
sustainable agriculture: A review on water and nutrient retention. Water,
Air, & Soil Pollution. 228:1-34. Ouda, S. and A.E.-H.
Zohry. 2024. Wheat: High consumption and unfulfilled production. In Integration of legume crops with cereal
crops under changing climate: Sustainably increasing food production:
Springer, 1-34. USDA
2024. Pakistan: Grain and Feed Update. Available online : Pakistan: Grain and Feed Update
| USDA Foreign Agricultural Service Verma, A.K., M.C.
Meena, S. Datta, B. Dwivedi, D. Golui, V. Singh, M. Shrivastava, A. Kumar, G.
Louhar and R. Meena. 2021. Effect of long-term integration of sewage-sludge
and fertilizers on wheat productivity, profitability and soil fertility.
Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science. 69:80-85. |